The Strange History of About Mirrors

Why Were Mirrors Once Feared?

First published on Medium

There are not many things in the modern house that seem as casual as a mirror. It sits silently in a bathroom. It stands by the door, patient. It lies against a bedroom wall catching some light with no words. We use it daily with little thought.

Historically, that casual relationship would have been unthinkable.

For the greater part of human history, mirrors were not instruments of vanity. They were presumed to be unstable objects. Dangerous ones at times. The fact that a reflective surface could show your own face bore implications that ran much deeper than just looks. Reflection implied duplication. It implied capture. It brought to the surface uncomfortable questions about where the image originated from and what, precisely, was being held inside the glass.

Long before mirrors were made of silvered glass, people encountered their reflections in water. Still pools. Dark basins. Wells. Those reflections were unreliable. They moved when the water moved. They distorted with wind or shadow. You could see yourself and then lose yourself just as quickly. That instability shaped early beliefs. A reflection wasn’t just an image. It was something that could be taken, altered, or withheld.

This is where mirrors begin to pick up their reputation.

Reflective surfaces in many ancient cultures were associated with the soul. Not in a metaphorical sense. In a literal sense. To see yourself was to see some version of your spirit, and anything that could hold that image was viewed warily. Break the surface and you risk breaking something essential. Disturb it, and you might attract the interest of whatever was watching from the other side.

That belief never really disappeared; it simply dressed in a different outfit.

By the time polished metal mirrors appeared in places like ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome, their use was already layered with ritual meaning. Mirrors were buried with the dead, not as personal items, but as protective tools. They were used in divination practices, angled to catch light in specific ways, believed to reveal messages from gods, ancestors, or unseen forces. Roman writers warned that mirrors used during illness could trap a weakened soul. Chinese traditions cautioned against placing mirrors where they might reflect sleepers, for fear the spirit could wander and fail to return.

None of this was fringe belief. This was common thinking.

Even in the Middle Ages, mirrors were treated with great care. They were costly and scarce and often covered when not being gazed into. Surfaces for reflection soon took on competing associations with both truth and deception. The mirror could show what was hidden but it could also lie. It reversed the world. It showed a version of reality that looked right but wasn’t quite correct. That reversal alone was enough to make theologians uneasy.

This is where the idea that mirrors might act like portals begins to form.

The belief wasn’t that a mirror opened on its own. It was that it thinned something. That it created a boundary that could be crossed under the right conditions. This is why mirrors show up repeatedly in folk practices meant to see the dead, summon answers, or glimpse the future. Scrying mirrors, often blackened or darkened, were used specifically because they reduced the clarity of reflection. You weren’t supposed to see yourself clearly. You were supposed to see past yourself.

That idea survived longer than most people realize.

Covering mirrors after a death, a practice still observed in many households today, didn’t originate as a sign of respect or mourning. It was a containment measure. The belief was that the dead, newly unmoored, could become trapped in reflective surfaces, or worse, that the living might follow them unintentionally. A covered mirror wasn’t about grief. It was about control.

Even the superstition surrounding broken mirrors points back to these older beliefs. Seven years of bad luck wasn’t a random number. Seven was associated with cycles of renewal, spiritual completeness, and bodily regeneration in several ancient systems. Breaking a mirror wasn’t just breaking an object. It was interrupting a cycle. Damaging something that held more than it appeared to.

What’s interesting is how little of this thinking ever truly left us.

People still avoid mirrors in dark rooms. Still hesitate before saying certain things while looking at their own reflection. Still feel uneasy about mirrors facing beds, especially when they catch movement at night. Horror films didn’t invent that discomfort. They inherited it.

Even today, mirrors are rarely treated as neutral objects in ritual spaces. They’re turned away. Covered. Positioned carefully. And while most people would say they don’t believe a mirror can hold anything at all, their behavior often suggests otherwise.

We don’t treat mirrors like we treat tables or lamps.

We instinctively understand that a mirror does something different.

It doesn’t just reflect us. It returns us to ourselves, reversed and doubled, forcing a moment of confrontation we don’t get from other objects. It creates a silent exchange. You look in. Something looks back. Even if you don’t believe there’s anything more to it, the pause still happens.

That pause is the residue of history.

The modern mirror may be cheap, mass-produced, and casually mounted to drywall, but it carries a long memory. One shaped by water, metal, burial rites, illness, divination, and fear of losing what cannot be easily defined. We’ve learned to ignore most of that. We’ve trained ourselves to see mirrors as harmless.

Still, we cover them when death enters a room.

Still, we hesitate in the dark.

And still, in quiet moments, we avoid holding our own gaze for too long—just in case the reflection does more than reflect.

Next, we’ll discuss the mysteries of the threshold.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from WJ Brendle

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading